Monday, January 31, 2011
Dingleberries of Wisdom
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Life on the Crassy Knoll
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Shoot the Messenger
Why do we shoot the messenger? Or worse yet, leave the messenger to die by a jury of his or her peers when the message isn't acted upon? As HR leaders, I ask your thoughts on these questions. Here's our scenario.
A tough-minded HR Leader goes to his/her boss and says, "We are missing someone to fill role XYZ. It's critical to fill this role for 1-2-3-...-100 reasons. I cannot add a headcount to do it. I need you to take this up the food chain and solve this problem for me. As a boss, I think you're the roadblock removing sort, please help." Boss says, "I've got this."
Weeks got by, our protagonist (let's call her/him "P" for short) follows up with boss as the empty role goes unfilled. "Oh. I forgot." "Oh, I have to catch up with other boss-type to do this." P starts filling the gap as the issues related to no one in role XYZ pile-up at the door step. Silly P.
So finally the boss comes back! Yay! Or not. "Give us staffing options for how to do this." P scratches head and thinks, "I thought I did."
Meanwhile BIG C (Customer with capital C) gets mad because reason 54 for this role is not achieved. P is now getting drawn and quartered by unknown peers for "lack of responsiveness". Shot by her/his peers.
Why do we do this to good people? Marti's blog about "What they aren't telling you" has cogent points, but really HR Leaders, listen to what they do say, too. Might save a P from friendly fire.
Shoot the Messenger
Why do we shoot the messenger? Or worse yet, leave the messenger to die by a jury of his or her peers when the message isn't acted upon? As HR leaders, I ask your thoughts on these questions. Here's our scenario.
A tough-minded HR Leader goes to his/her boss and says, "We are missing someone to fill role XYZ. It's critical to fill this role for 1-2-3-...-100 reasons. I cannot add a headcount to do it. I need you to take this up the food chain and solve this problem for me. As a boss, I think you're the roadblock removing sort, please help." Boss says, "I've got this."
Weeks got by, our protagonist (let's call her/him "P" for shot) follows up as the empty role goes unfilled. "Oh. I forgot." "Oh, I have to catch up with other boss-type to do this." P starts filling the gap as the issues related to no one in role XYZ pile-up at the door step. Silly P.
So finally the boss comes back! Yay! Or not. "Give us staffing options for how to do this." P scratches head and thinks, "I thought I did."
Meanwhile BIG C (Customer with capital C) gets mad because reason 54 for this role is not achieved. P is now getting drawn and quartered by unknown peers for "lack of responsiveness". Shot by her/his peers.
Why do we do this to good people? Marti's blog about "What they aren't telling you" has cogent points, but really HR Leadersn listen to what they do say, too. Might save a P from friendly fire.
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Ghost Writer's Mail Bag
Ghost Writer, I authored a skills program for my employer. New management just took over and wanted it re-vamped. Now, everyone in the place (qualified or not) has put their two cents in. This last "revision" is a completely butchered form of what I originally wrote. Should I give the "new" format an honest try?
Answer:
You built something you think is fantastic, and now it's dying by consensus. In my world, we call your original work, "Breakthrough Change" and what's happening with the consensus changes is "Continuous Improvement". Some work environments can't handle radical change. While you may be able to do that personally, that group doesn't have that in them. (Give them some credit for life experience that didn't reward change.)
There are two options. A -- Let it go as is, at least you got some of the changes you wanted and live to morph it again in the future. You live to be the Continuous Improvement architect and show your "innovation" in the future (even though for you, it's like "that was so 10 years ago"). B -- You take your brilliant plan and go home. It's always an option. It's not going to change what they do, but you went out standing. There would be a third option -- show your boss the original brilliance and compare it to the "new" version. But he/she has already done that.
Sometimes option A is where we breakthrough thinkers have to compromise. We see the bigger picture -- the ah-ha moment was there for us. However, we saw it alone, so no one believes this is the bigger bang. Lesson for you -- seek consensus earlier, or don't expect support. I HATE THIS, BTW. Totally! I hate begging people to love my brilliant, beautiful baby, but it's the world of work.
The good news is -- at least some your brilliant ideas have hit the table and will see the light of day. It beats nothing. Your pride may be hurt, but the resume' instantly looks better.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
How I Survived Corporate Interrment Camp
Friday, January 14, 2011
Consider Becoming the Not-So-Undercover Boss
Right now I'm in a project revolutionizing a transactional process -- a very cool project on which I work with three dear colleagues. Last week on the project, the team found we have not 1, not 2, but 3, yes 3, degree-certified professionals detaching paper A from paper B and attaching paper B to paper C. Everyday. Multiple times per day. And why were they executing this brilliantly designed process? So Employee Group A didn't have to use a computer system (on which the group already works) to look up information.
I wish this blog had a screaming head icon... talk about things that drive me crazy.
In Marti's recent post, "What they aren't telling you," she highlighted some of sharing implications of what employees don't tell the boss. I'm telling you, "Bosses! Get in the detail of your employees work! NOW!" Not to micromanage them but to get ridiculous tasks like this out of their work day. This piece of paper was a known issue but "no one" could resolve it. Really? This small group of folks kept talking, asking, and found that it could go away... in less than 4 hours. Literally, 4 hours after the idea hit the table, the problem was gone.
The popular TV Show, "Undercover Boss", shows a boss learning appreciation for the details of his/her work teams by going undercover. Really, HR Leaders, it doesn't have to be that complex. Just get trained to do your employee's jobs. Not that you want the work, but there is extreme value in knowing what's going on in the trenches. Valuable improved morale. Valuable time to be recaptured. Valuable moment to engage them and show you care.
Go Not-So-Undercover Boss and figure out the junk they deal with everyday. They'll thank you for it, and based on the response since this incident, the team will start to ask, "Do I really have to do _____?" before continuing to do crazy stuff that doesn't seem to make sense.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Belaboring A Point
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry